95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.83%
Growth of 30.83% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
40.51%
Cost growth of 40.51% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
16.30%
Growth of 16.30% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-11.10%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
G&A growth less than half of SA's 100.06%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.07%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SA's 100.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.29%
Total costs growth less than half of SA's 100.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
218.69%
Interest expense change of 218.69% while SA maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
50.21%
D&A growth while SA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.23%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
Margin change of 0.31% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
2.77%
Operating income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.45%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.72%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 77.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
78.26%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.45%
Net income decline while SA shows 9.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.87%
Net margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
EPS decline while SA shows 9.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SA shows 12.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while SA shows 3.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.