95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.48%
Revenue decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.95%
Cost reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.49%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.71%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
G&A growth while SA reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.03%
Operating expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Total costs growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
408.21%
Interest expense growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.94%
D&A growth while SA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.96%
EBITDA decline while SA shows 31.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.04%
EBITDA margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.71%
Operating income decline while SA shows 27.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.36%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
96.53%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
123.83%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.48%
Margin change of 125.48% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
65.78%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
124.21%
Net income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.89%
Margin change of 125.89% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
123.81%
EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.