95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Growth of 10.84% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
22.63%
Cost growth of 22.63% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-5.28%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.54%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
G&A reduction while SA shows 15.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.13%
Operating expenses reduction while SA shows 15.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x SA's 15.47%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
10.94%
Interest expense growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.52%
D&A growth while SA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
EBITDA margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-969.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.49%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Net margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 12.76%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 12.76%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.