PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.85%
Revenue decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.72%
Cost reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.34%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin change of 9.15% while SA shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
G&A growth above 1.5x SA's 5.30%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.50%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SA's 155.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-20.93%
Total costs reduction while SA shows 155.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.25%
Interest expense reduction while SA shows 130.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.37%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
346.56%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.22%
EBITDA margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.14%
Margin change of 4.14% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
97.25%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
149.05%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.70%
Margin change of 159.70% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-148.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
149.47%
Net income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
Margin change of 160.22% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
148.39%
EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.