95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Growth of 5.83% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
2.78%
Cost growth of 2.78% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
12.55%
Growth of 12.55% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
6.36%
Margin change of 6.36% while SA shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x SA's 47.17%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SA's 46.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Total costs growth less than half of SA's 46.91%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
31.12%
Interest expense growth less than half of SA's 368.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.87%
D&A growth while SA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.36%
EBITDA margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 1.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 3.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.