95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.92%
Growth of 23.92% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
5.53%
Cost growth of 5.53% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
42.28%
Growth of 42.28% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
14.82%
Margin change of 14.82% while SA shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-177.96%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 5588.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.38%
Total costs growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-40.34%
Interest expense reduction while SA shows 706.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.23%
D&A change of 3.23% while SA maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
33.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SA's 244.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.62%
Margin change of 4.62% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
51.76%
Operating income growth below 50% of SA's 206.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.46%
Margin change of 22.46% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-324.41%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 17071.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.33%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SA's 240.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.70%
Margin change of 19.70% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
99.10%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.64%
Net income growth below 50% of SA's 222.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.30%
Margin change of 14.30% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
37.50%
EPS growth below 50% of SA's 212.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SA's 218.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 2.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 1.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.