95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.44%
Growth of 3.44% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
8.53%
Cost growth of 8.53% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-0.52%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.82%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
G&A growth less than half of SA's 158.60%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
828.79%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SA's 85.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
16.40%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SA's 453.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.27%
Total costs growth less than half of SA's 453.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.26%
D&A change of 8.26% while SA maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.99%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.14%
Margin change of 1.14% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
3.37%
Operating income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
183.39%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.08%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.90%
Margin change of 108.90% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
58.43%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.27%
Net income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.08%
Margin change of 109.08% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
116.67%
EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.