PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.76%
Revenue decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.03%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-37.06%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 79.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.87%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
G&A reduction while SA shows 4.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.11%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 442.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.29%
Operating expenses reduction while SA shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.64%
Total costs reduction while SA shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.65%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.18%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18698.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SA's 878.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
39.65%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.31%
Margin change of 93.31% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5873.13%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.79%
Net income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.42%
Margin change of 82.42% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
30.30%
EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 0.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while SA reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.