95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Growth of 23.62% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
135.58%
Cost increase while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.89%
Growth of 0.89% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-18.39%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth above 1.5x SA's 15.52%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-98.02%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-85.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-93.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.28%
D&A growth less than half of SA's 70.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
92.10%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SA's 135.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
55.39%
Margin change of 55.39% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
147.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SA's 46.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
99.91%
Margin change of 99.91% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 156.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Similar pre-tax income growth to SA's 135.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
91.50%
Margin change of 91.50% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of SA's 402.37%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
188.14%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 125.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
133.07%
Margin change of 133.07% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
194.74%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SA's 123.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SA's 123.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 5.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 6.00%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.