95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.55%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 13.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 90.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
355.66%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 38.66%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.17%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.76%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 10.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.30%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 73.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-70.39%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
224.31%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 20.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-56.84%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.19%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 43.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
EPS decline while SAND shows 50.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.