95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.81%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.81%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 38.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.49%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-197.38%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.79%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.39%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.80%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-197.39%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.42%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-197.36%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.76%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 43.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.04%
EPS decline while SAND shows 50.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.04%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.