95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.05%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.05%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-155.06%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 38.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.17%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
507.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-18.92%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.12%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.92%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 73.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-325.87%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.48%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.28%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 43.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
171.04%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 50.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
171.04%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 49.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.