95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.83%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
26.25%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.37%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 10.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.94%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 90.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
29.17%
Similar operating expenses growth to SAND's 38.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
16.68%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.17%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 10.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.80%
Similar operating margin growth to SAND's 5.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
116.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 73.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
28.21%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SAND's 39.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
7.01%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 36.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-35.52%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
29.72%
Net income growth 50-75% of SAND's 47.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.26%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 43.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
EPS growth 50-75% of SAND's 50.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SAND's 49.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.01%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.