95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.14%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.47%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
Margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.90%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 90.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.47%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 38.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.47%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.37%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.48%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.96%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.94%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
505.88%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 73.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.74%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.64%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.68%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.12%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.09%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 43.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.31%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.