PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.91%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-13.92%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.28%
Margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.54%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 90.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 38.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.10%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.70%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.10%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 10.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.76%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.51%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-121.15%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 73.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.99%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.54%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.50%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 43.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.67%
EPS decline while SAND shows 50.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.61%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.