95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin change of 1.18% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses change of 15.84% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses change of 15.76% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.08%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
83.18%
Interest expense change of 83.18% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.76%
D&A change of 15.76% while SAND maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
Margin change of 2.37% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.93%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.35%
Net income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.45%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.36%
Share count change of 0.36% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.53%
Diluted share change of 0.53% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.