PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.50%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.48%
Cost growth of 2.48% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-7.30%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.94%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.00%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.28%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 53.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.20%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 53.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.59%
Interest expense change of 3.59% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-14.49%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.14%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.18%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
Other expenses change of 2.65% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-6.01%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
145.30%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.11%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.34%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 38.76%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 38.76%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.