PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Growth of 26.85% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.01%
Cost growth of 14.01% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
32.57%
Growth of 32.57% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
4.51%
Margin change of 4.51% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Other expenses change of 22.47% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
41.31%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.65%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.23%
Interest expense change of 16.23% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
35.54%
D&A change of 35.54% while SAND maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
33.13%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 77.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.41%
Margin change of 2.41% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
31.93%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 77.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.01%
Margin change of 4.01% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-39.75%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.88%
Income change of 30.88% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
3.18%
Margin change of 3.18% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
61.18%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.71%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 83.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.25%
Margin change of 2.25% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
22.22%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 88.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 88.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 41.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.49%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 41.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.