PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.49%
Growth of 1.49% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.50%
Cost growth of 1.50% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
1.48%
Growth of 1.48% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-0.00%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.00%
Other expenses change of 28.00% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.12%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.24%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3925.00%
Interest expense change of 3925.00% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
28.00%
D&A change of 28.00% while SAND maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.05%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 46.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.84%
Margin change of 2.84% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.13%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 46.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.34%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10587.50%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.27%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1271.67%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.66%
Net income decline while SAND shows 82.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.88%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
EPS decline while SAND shows 94.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 94.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.21%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 229.60%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.66%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 229.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.