95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.55%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.93%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-29.83%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.75%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.76%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.20%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 1535.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.61%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 1535.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.00%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.25%
Margin change of 9.25% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-19.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Margin change of 7.58% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-119.18%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.84%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.17%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 2.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.72%
Margin change of 9.72% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 22.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 22.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.