PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Growth of 0.28% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
222.53%
Cost growth of 222.53% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-82.43%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-82.47%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.30%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 369.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.42%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
147.69%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.48%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 27.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-86.12%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 84.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.16%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.52%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 84.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.53%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2651.65%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-365.99%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-365.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-119.87%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-362.24%
Net income decline while SAND shows 86.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-361.52%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
EPS decline while SAND shows 86.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-325.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 86.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.15%
Share count change of 16.15% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.54%
Diluted share change of 9.54% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.