PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 730.64%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
22.81%
Cost growth less than half of SAND's 648.93%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
80.95%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 794.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.30%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 7.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A growth less than half of SAND's 88.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 88.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
88.65%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 212.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 622.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
45.74%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.55%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 82.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.00%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.53%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 73.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
140.04%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 3061.58%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
77.13%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 1041.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 213.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-84.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
77.62%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 1733.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 296.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 1729.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 1729.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.51%
Share count change of 2.51% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.79%
Diluted share change of 2.79% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.