PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 37.31%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-18.65%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 62.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
14.32%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SAND's 20.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
8.10%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 9.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.99%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-52.97%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 9.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.05%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 37.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.55%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 113.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 489.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 383.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 237.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.82%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 199.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-98.54%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.82%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
71.42%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of SAND's 98.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-0.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
94.44%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.