PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.91%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 6088.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.94%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 6082.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.35%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 6093.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.46%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.36%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.90%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.03%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 312.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.39%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 9947.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.27%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 235.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.67%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.96%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 556.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.00%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 107.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-97.81%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.58%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 189.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.34%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 101.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
272.83%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.80%
Net income decline while SAND shows 182.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.09%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 101.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
EPS decline while SAND shows 183.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 184.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.83%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.