PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.60%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 15.98%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
20.16%
Cost growth above 1.5x SAND's 6.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.21%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 23.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.68%
Margin decline while SAND shows 6.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 120.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.44%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.33%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 120.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.09%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SAND's 24.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.32%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.46%
Similar EBITDA growth to SAND's 4.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.18%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 8.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-395.45%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 7.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
7.19%
Net income growth 50-75% of SAND's 11.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.46%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 19.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.02%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.