95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.05%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 21.02%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.32%
Cost growth less than half of SAND's 35.81%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.81%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 10.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.73%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.37%
Other expenses change of 15.37% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
34.04%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.92%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.07%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 100.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.23%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 44.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.83%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 23.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 13.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
192.31%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 29.73%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 14.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1408.11%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 546.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.68%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.44%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.