PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.89%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 11.07%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
17.72%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x SAND's 14.59%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-3.63%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 8.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 19.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.45%
Other expenses change of 124.45% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.45%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 19.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
16.41%
Similar total costs growth to SAND's 15.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.39%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 16.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-1.18%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 13.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 2.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.14%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 5.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.92%
Net income decline while SAND shows 19.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
EPS decline while SAND shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.44%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 0.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.