95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 0.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.34%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.24%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-31.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-28.35%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.44%
Interest expense growth less than half of SAND's 222.99%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-32.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of SAND's 2.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-16.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.21%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-16.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-81.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.71%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.