PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-28.37%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 23.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-39.78%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 49.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.08%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 1.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.38%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while SAND maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-173.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.88%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-36.68%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 26.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-69.19%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.20%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 78.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-31.06%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 52.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.43%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 2144.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.08%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-358.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.41%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-47.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.79%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.