PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
38.55%
Cost growth above 1.5x SAND's 6.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 8.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.99%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.54%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
32.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
271.32%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.79%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 21.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-28.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-305.33%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 20.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.37%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 3.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 3.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.