PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 14.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 13.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 18.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while SAND shows 3.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 14.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 213.81%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 33.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 18.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 2.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 84.18%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 87.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 88.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 55.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 90.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 92.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 90.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 90.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.