PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.61%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 2.70%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.81%
Cost growth less than half of SAND's 8.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 9.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.35%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.14%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-25.89%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 12.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.43%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 12.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.61%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 15.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.87%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 12.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.39%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 32.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 29.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.31%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-885.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
21.86%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.12%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.39%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.81%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.