PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SAND's 18.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
14.02%
Cost growth 50-75% of SAND's 21.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.27%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 7.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 37.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.17%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 25.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.93%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 22.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.35%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 14.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.65%
D&A growth 50-75% of SAND's 29.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
16.07%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 11.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.27%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-535.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
170.24%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 128.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
-92.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 4.30%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.