95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.03%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 22.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.28%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 26.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.03%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 3.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
12.97%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 40.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.76%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 31.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.16%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 27.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.62%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 26.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.85%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 14.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.03%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.97%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-19.43%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 1371.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.30%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 145.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.03%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 100.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
469.98%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 126.47%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-5.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.16%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.14%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.14%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.