PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
52.04%
Cost growth above 1.5x SAND's 10.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
46.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 3.31%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-46.80%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
66.29%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 15.91%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
23.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.47%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 8.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.54%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.36%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.98%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 2127.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.72%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.94%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.