PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.83%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
40.51%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.30%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.07%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 1045.12%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
37.18%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x SAND's 33.47%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
40.29%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
218.69%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 152.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
50.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.63%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
31.23%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.77%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.72%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-68.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
78.26%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while SAND shows 15.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 15.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.