PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.25%
Similar revenue growth to SAND's 17.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.71%
Cost growth less than half of SAND's 26.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
29.46%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.32%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 0.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-153.10%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 26.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.12%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 11.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.98%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 23.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-33.79%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 16.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.22%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 35.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.93%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 15.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.54%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.40%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.33%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.16%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.07%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.16%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 120.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
47.16%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.95%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.38%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 1.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.40%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 2.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.