95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 14.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.00%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 9.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.86%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 24.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.96%
Margin expansion 50-75% of SAND's 9.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 47.83%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.15%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 7.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 4.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.60%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.52%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 27.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
91.81%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 265.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 2941.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 2585.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
168.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of SAND's 778.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
463.45%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 36752.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
635.77%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 32155.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
460.00%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 50100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 40100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.