PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.88%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.53%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.58%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
Similar G&A growth to SAND's 16.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.49%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 7.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.37%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.71%
Interest expense growth less than half of SAND's 34.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.60%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.19%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.65%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.70%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.30%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-534.38%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
10.43%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.48%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.