PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 11.66%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.85%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.02%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 54.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.63%
Margin decline while SAND shows 38.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 22.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-399.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.04%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 9.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.38%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.88%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 17.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.47%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 15.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.61%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 3.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.37%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 109.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.29%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 87.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 260.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.11%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 467.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 429.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.70%
Tax expense growth less than half of SAND's 3159.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.53%
Net income decline while SAND shows 350.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.15%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 323.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 19.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 25.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.