PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.50%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.06%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 7.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.79%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.14%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 5.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.09%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2772.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-307.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.86%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-306.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-273.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.