PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.85%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 26.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.72%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 16.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.34%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 46.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin expansion 50-75% of SAND's 16.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.50%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.93%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 9.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.37%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 23.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
346.56%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.22%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 19.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.45%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 155.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 102.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
97.25%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 11.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
149.05%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-148.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
149.47%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.