PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.60%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.02%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2.05%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Margin decline while SAND shows 3.41% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.30%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.22%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.08%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 54.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.39%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.95%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 2.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3964.56%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
365.59%
Similar pre-tax income growth to SAND's 337.93%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
336.77%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SAND's 344.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-564.74%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 216.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
367.01%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 76.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
338.10%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 81.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
380.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 80.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 78.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.13%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.