PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.54%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.25%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-33.72%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 1.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-24.21%
Margin decline while SAND shows 10.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-699.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
127.55%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.58%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.99%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 1.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.05%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 3.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.74%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 13.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-105.92%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 39.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-88.91%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 49.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 63.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
128.07%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-89.31%
Net income decline while SAND shows 218.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.77%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 248.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
EPS decline while SAND shows 177.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 194.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.10%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.