PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.98%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.78%
Cost growth less than half of SAND's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.55%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.36%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 23.32%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 9.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 17.87%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Similar total costs growth to SAND's 11.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
31.12%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
D&A growth 50-75% of SAND's 7.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-3.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.52%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 170.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.99%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 33.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 32.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 37.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-79.93%
Net income decline while SAND shows 31.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 30.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
EPS decline while SAND shows 54.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 54.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.