PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 4.07%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.68%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 3.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
34.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.26%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.27%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 12.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-21.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.23%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SAND's 2.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-17.40%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 18.91%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
27.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 17.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.93%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 13.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
61.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 20.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
40.78%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 15.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.07%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
124.46%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.07%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.59%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 5.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
739.91%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
633.70%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
766.67%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.