PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.17%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.25%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.42%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
G&A growth less than half of SAND's 40.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.45%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 78.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.37%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 56.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.19%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 4.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.60%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.46%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.89%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.97%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.32%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.44%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 70.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.18%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.06%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.23%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.