PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.14%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.41%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
28.42%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.51%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2134.62%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.78%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.94%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-51.23%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 2.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.89%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.68%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.43%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 8.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.60%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.42%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 12.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
35.06%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.50%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.84%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.41%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.24%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.