PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.68%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.63%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.29%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.77%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.75%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.45%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.74%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 1158.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.66%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 4.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
80.52%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of SAND's 128.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-2.25%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 180.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 192.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-156.85%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 453.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.50%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 169.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 178.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 166.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 168.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.72%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 10.36%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.