PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.92%
Similar revenue growth to SAND's 24.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.53%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
42.28%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SAND's 63.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
14.82%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 31.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-177.96%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 1.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.38%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-40.34%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.23%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.17%
Similar EBITDA growth to SAND's 35.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
4.62%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of SAND's 8.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
51.76%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 121.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.46%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 77.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-324.41%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
48.33%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 19.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.10%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of SAND's 146.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
41.64%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.30%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.92%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.